New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
Hyperpartisanship, Propaganda & Hypocrisy
Afghanistan & Sherman's Legacy
Epistemology, Materialists & Morality
Cleaning Up the House
Worse Than the Stench of the Stable
Obama's Shameful Education Affair
Healthcare Reform: The Good, The Bad & The Ugly
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Fear
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

(Let's Hope) We’re Not Gonna Take It Anymore
October 13, 2009

There’s no arguing that congressional Democrats are smart not to put their healthcare bills online — After all, more than anyone else, they know that if people learn about everything in those abominations, they might get so riled up as to make last summer’s town halls look like a meeting of the salad nibblers who populate the Nobel Prize literature and peace committees.

And abominations the bills truly are, as Democrats insist upon empowering not individuals but the Federal Government (explaining why the Wyden (D-OR)-Bennett (R-Utah) bill had not a snowball’s chance).

Not only that but there is this additional perversity:

Democrats plan to pay for their twisted handiwork by enacting cowardly, shamelessly regressive taxes that are certain to be multiplied; for if talk of wringing money out of folks burdened by high medical bills and those who dare enjoy a soda or Twinkie is already here, can whispers about a tax on milk and bread (as part of a war on obesity and diabetes) be far behind?

Sound frightful? Well, the bad news is that things are sure to get worse because of this immutable political reality:

Given the worship of power, money, hypocrisy, and every other kind of rottenness that modern lovers of centralized government have inherited from their aristocratic forebears, the healthcare bills will be further corrupted as politicians continue to foul them with additional "legislative language.”

Then — if one of these bills becomes law — it will everlastingly be perverted by the "legal/bureaucratic language” that oozes from the judicial/bureaucratic complex.

As a matter of fact, the second level of corruption has already begun, as evidenced by the astonishing information uncovered and reported by Kimberley Strassel ("States of Personal Privilege,” WSJ).

Here are the pertinent facts from the article:

The Baucus bill proposes to cover many of the nation’s uninsured by requiring the expansion of state Medicaid programs, with the Federal Government picking up only part of the cost, thus sticking already strapped states with a $37 billion tab.

What has Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid done about this "problem”? According to Strassel, he "worked out a deal by which the federal government will pay all of his home state’s additional Medicaid expenses for the next five years.”

Furthermore, under Reid’s "very special formula,” Oregon, Rhode Island, and Michigan will receive this benefit because (in Reid’s words) they "are suffering more than most.”

Now, nothing that has ever existed or currently exists could be more self-evident in its unfairness, hypocrisy, and rottenness.

Therefore, without another word, on to the next stinking cloud Ms. Strassel has uncovered.

It has been widely reported that to pay for Obamacare, Democrats propose levying a 40% tax on "luxury” health plans. And that is the case in the Baucus bill.

Ah, but in Liberaldom, piggish health plans are not created equal.

That explains why "Sen. Chuck Schumer [whose union base has negotiated many ‘Cadillac’ plans] . . . and other similarly situated Democrats carved out a deal by which the threshold for this tax will be higher in their states.”

Therefore, as Strassel reports, "If you live in Kentucky, you get taxed at $21,000. If you live in Massachusetts you don’t get taxed until $25,000.

She then observes that although "this carve-out” applies "to 17 (largely blue) states . . . that’s cold comfort if you live in Louisville.”

Cold comfort, indeed, when you think that "Party of the People” Democrats who never miss an opportunity to plume themselves as champions of fairness in all things have no problem mustering up the chutzpah required to force less affluent folks of 33 states to pick up part of the healthcare tab for their rich state neighbors.

Next, Strassel takes a look at how the Baucus bill echoes the Obama administration’s boast that it has forced drug companies to pay their fair share toward healthcare reform.

She begins by pointing out that New Jersey’s website makes the claim that Jersey is the "global epicenter” of the drug industry because 15 of the world’s 20 largest pharmaceutical companies maintain major facilities there.

Having done that, she informs us that Senator Bob Menendez (D-NJ) has cut a "quiet deal for a $1 billion tax credit for companies investing in drug R&D.”

Again, no further words are necessary to demonstrate that there is something rotten in the state of the Democratic Party.

Finally, Strassel exposes yet another act of reeking hypocrisy when she reminds us that in line with the precepts of Obamacare, the Baucus bill promises to "bend down the health-care cost curve.”

Then, she points out that Senators Stabenow (D-MI) and Kerry (D-MA) "included $5 billion in the bill for a reinsurance program designed to defray the medical costs of union members.”

Stabenow’s explanation for this special welfare program? "This will help our employers, whether it’s the auto industry or whether it’s other industries, be able to lower their costs for early retirees.”

But as Ms. Strassel excellently observes, "[The Senator] is apparently unaware that this is what the broader bill is supposed to do, even without $5 billion in union slush money.”

To conclude, Kimberley Strassel deserves the thanks of every citizen who believes in keeping alive the dreams bequeathed to us by the Founders.

However, her work must serve not just to inform but to move us to action — in our discussions with friends and family, in our communications with our elected officials, in our willingness to support the causes in which we believe with our presence, time, and money, and in our actions at the polls.

Indeed, if the contemptible insults that Ms. Strassel has brought to light — insults both to us and the legacy we have inherited — do not motivate us to commit ourselves to the notion that "we’re not gonna take it anymore,” we will merit the worst of the negative consequences flowing from the reality that "In a democracy, people get the kind of government they deserve.”

Social Bookmarking
               

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review