New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
News Anchor Uncles
Goldman Sachs America
Krugman & The Boiled Frog

American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

The Real (Audaciously Arrogant) Mob
August 14, 2009

Ever since the "great” Karl Marx and Company proclaimed their superiority over all other social/political/economic thinkers because they claimed to have discovered the purely material principles that underlie "scientific” socialism, one of the defining characteristics of the political left has been the kind of ridiculous, pretentious pride being displayed in the healthcare debate by Democrats.


Think about it. With respect to reforming an industry that consumes 16% of our economy and literally deals with issues of life and death, Democrats could have proposed a reasonable approach that would have enjoyed wide public support.


For example, they could have fashioned a proposal that begins by implementing the goal put forth by Paul O’Neill (NY Times, July, 2009), specifically, to recover "roughly $1 trillion” of annual health care "waste” with relatively little cost and not a single new medication or technology.


Now, even if Mr. O’Neill’s estimate is off by 50%, we’re talking about a huge amount of money.


So, what are the reforms that the former Secretary of the Treasury asserts "doctors and administrators already know how to do”?


Eliminate the millions of infections acquired at hospitals every year.


Eliminate the annual toll of 300 million medication errors.


Eliminate pneumonia caused by ventilators.


Eliminate falls that injure hospital patients.


In addition to supporting that kind of reform, a wide majority of Americans (63% according to Pew) support tort reform (actually, "lawyer-care reform”) and anti-trust reform, which, taken together, will reduce the cost of doctors’ overhead, health insurance premiums, and drug costs.


And what American who doesn’t benefit from corruption in the healthcare system wouldn’t support a real plan to conduct a war on waste and fraud in Medicare?


(Where might the first shot of such a campaign be fired? How about McAllen, Texas, where, according to Atul Gawande (New Yorker), "In 2006, Medicare spent fifteen thousand dollars per enrollee...almost twice the national average.”)


Yes, if Democrats would get to work implementing the reforms just mentioned, they could take credit for saving the American public an enormous amount of pain and suffering — physical, mental, and financial.


Moreover, having thereby earned the public’s trust, they could continue to serve the nation by empowering the states to innovate regarding a host of other health care issues, including providing help to those who are uninsured through no fault of their own.


Problem is, the notion of Democratic politicians working to offer the American people an incremental, practicable, results oriented, creative, market based regimen for healthcare reform exists only in the conditional if’s, would’s, and could’s that remind us of the Yiddish proverb, "If my grandmother would have had testicles, she’d have been my grandfather!”


Why that conclusion?


The answer is simple:


"Intellectually superior” leftists think only in terms of grand schemes that they (who else?) enact, administrate, and adjudicate at the level of government most remote from the ignorant, crude, callous "mob” the Constitution celebrates as "the people.”


And it is precisely that contemptible arrogance that explains the following behaviors regarding what is almost certain to become The Democratic Healthcare Reform Debacle:


...Barack Obama rejected taking time to listen to the people in favor of directing medical and social geniuses Nancy Pelosi, Henry Waxman, Harry Reid, Christopher Dodd, Max Baucus, and the rest of congressional Democrats (job approval 24%) to completely restructure the nation’s healthcare system in two months.


...Barack Obama reacted to opponents of his healthcare madness by posting the following appeal on the White House website:


If you get an email or see something on the web about health insurance reform that seems fishy, send it to


In a very convenient omission, the appeal fails to mention that if the "fishy” submission contains the name of the commentator, protestor, etc., Obama’s White House could be guilty of "maintaining” a "record” on a U.S. citizen in violation of The Privacy Act of 1974. But then, the president might be spending so many hours burnishing his reputation as a "constitutional scholar” that he doesn’t have time to concern himself with mere statute law.


...Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (USA Today) despicably employed Saul Alinsky’s "rule” that urges leftist "angels” to "target, freeze, personalize, and polarize” society’s "devils” when they characterized citizens who protest Obamacare at town hall meetings as moral/intellectual marshmallows whom "swastika” adorned crazies recruited to be part of an "ugly campaign” that trades in "un-American” tactics.


...The DNC’ s Brad Woodhouse dutifully echoed Democrats in the White House and Congress when he spoke of town hall meetings besieged by "angry mobs of rabid right-wing extremists.”


...The NY Times’ Charles M. Blow complained that the meetings have been "hijacked by hooligans” whose "belligerence” marks them as "intellectually bankrupt.”


...The NY Times’ Gail Collins mocked Americans who are frightened and angered by Obamacare as "loud and unlovable hecklers” who make "members of Congress look...sympathetic.”


Finally, and topping off this mile-high pile of garbage being spewed by America’s insufferable, self-proclaimed intellectual elite, there is the fact that from Obama on down, Democrats are asking the American people to believe that without any reductions in medical services, they will pay the $1.5 trillion cost of their all-at-once "reform” exclusively through taxing the rich.


That lie — lied, by the way, in the midst of a nearly two trillion dollar annual deficit three-quarters of which Obama and Friends have created and have promised to reduce substantially without taxing the middle class — brings us to this final observation:


Only an incredibly audacious, frighteningly dangerous, stunningly stupid, perfectly obnoxious arrogance can possibly be the force impelling Democrats to denounce the more than half of the population who oppose Obamacare — including a great number of senior citizens — as a "mob” enamored of Nazi Fascism.


But not to worry; for Americans know that in addition to denoting a "disorderly crowd,” the word mob denotes "an affiliation of gangsters.” That piece of knowledge, coupled with their understanding of "The Spirit of ’76,” means they can never be fooled about who the mobsters really are.
Social Bookmarking

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal,, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media © 2011
A Division of

Dreamhost Review