New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up. Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Recent Articles
Krugman & The Boiled Frog
American Aristocrats
Long After the Last Cow Has Come Home
Obama Being Obama
Liberals and The Big Hate
The Frog-Worship Scandal
Thomas Jefferson: Don’t Question a Supreme Court Nominee Without Him
I Never Knew That!
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine II
Language: A Canary in the Coal Mine
Colin Powell Comes Up Small
Headlines, Torture & American Values
Something Very Deep and Dark
Miss California’s Unforgivable Mistake
The President in the Garden
Liberals & The Triumph of Reason
Fear
Messiah, Lincoln or Less?
Obama, Big Bangs & Selling Make Believe
Hostile Alien Case Exposes Danger of Activist...
The Age of Arrogance
Lenin Lite, Perhaps?
Where’s the Guilt?
In the Matter of Public v. Stimulus Bill
Bigger Than the Bacon Explosion
Where Bill O’Reilly’s Going Wrong
Dear Camille
Liberals, Israel & Wolves
Sarkozy, Israel & The Neurotic Mind
The Problem with Hope
The Winter Solstice & the Triumph of Reason
Bush & Obama: Slouching Us Toward Disaster...
Beware the Recovery Plan
New Deal Not Such a Big Deal?
Republicans & The Courts
That Flatulent Thing Called Experience
Can Obama Call Spirits from the Vasty Deep?
A Million Calls, Ten Million Voters
Liberals Boiling, Conservatives Not, But...
The Merely Human Messiah and the Sea
Fully Understanding the Bill Ayres "Distraction”
How McCain Can Deliver a Last Round KO
Obama & The English Language
Are Americans Really Open to Obama’s New Ideas?
Love Behind the Most Rotten Golden Parachute of All
McCain & Reagan’s Broad Shoulders
When Conservatives Behave like Liberals
Maddening Times at the Gray Lady

AJ DiCintio

Krugman & The Boiled Frog
July 17, 2009

Paul Krugman is all in a worried sweat that America is "on its way to becoming a boiled frog” — that is, the mythical boiled frog that he correctly identifies as a "useful metaphor for a very real problem [which is] the difficulty of responding to disasters that creep up on you a bit at a time.”

 

Alas, this particular metaphor may have caused one or two impulsive folks on Main Street to shout a robust "hooray” that Professor Krugman has come to his senses and joined the great majority of Americans on the right and in the center who have, since the sixties, believed that a number of social, political, and economic disasters have insidiously been creeping up on the nation.

 

The rest of us, however, held off on issuing that exclamation of joy; for we have learned all too well there is often a devil (or a whole mess of devils) lurking in the details — in this case, details regarding Krugman’s take on the nation’s economic policy.

 

And devils there are; for we learn that to avoid betraying "The Revolution,” the far-left Nobel Prize winning economist, Princeton professor, and NY Times columnist isn’t above employing the propaganda technique called card stacking.

 

To make the point, let’s being with Krugman’s characterization of "the Obama stimulus plan” as a "fairly strong policy response” to the economic crisis.

 

Yes, it certainly is correct to use the term "Obama stimulus” because the buck stops with the man who signed the bill into law.

 

But after that bit of honesty, the propaganda begins as Krugman never mentions that Obama’s "plan” consisted of turning the writing of the bill over to Congress, where Pelosi, Reid, and other self-important, self-serving politicians who were determined never to "waste a good crisis” hastily dumped a Democratic Wish List of rotten pork into the congressional meat grinder to produce an abomination that has as much chance (zero) of creating "3.5 million jobs” as it has of producing a multiplier effect of "1.5” times the 787 billion dollars it borrows, spends, and wastes.

 

The professor is just as duplicitous when he praises the bill as a "fairly strong response” to the economic crisis because even in the face of its current failure, he offers not a word about the following facts:

 

...A huge amount of the "stimulus” money goes to states to pay for Medicaid, unemployment insurance costs, and other transfer payments that create not a single new job.

 

...The bill’s enormous price tag, when added to the trillions Obama proposes to borrow to "perfect this nation,” will cost jobs as economic growth is suppressed in a debt encumbered United States.

 

We come now to the Big Disaster currently disturbing Sweden’s favorite economist:

 

Paul Krugman worries that like the frog that is oblivious to the danger surrounding it, neither the Obama administration nor Congress "is showing any inclination ...to get another round of fiscal stimulus under way very soon” to avert an apparent jobless recovery.

 

"Another round of fiscal stimulus” from Obama, Pelosi, Reid et al.? Talk about being faithful to the dogmas of the Liberal Church!

 

And faithful Krugman is to a fault, actually, to a gigantic fault, explaining why he has nothing to say about the work of Robert Barro, the Harvard professor who has studied the effects of government outlays during the thirties and the years of WWII, the "mother” of all periods that have seen great increases in public spending and borrowing.

 

After he explains why "the war-based multiplier of 0.8 substantially overstates the multiplier that applies to peacetime government purchases,” Barro goes on to say this about his research:

 

In any event, when I attempted to estimate directly the multiplier associated with peacetime government purchases, I got a number insignificantly different from zero. ("Government Spending Is No Free Lunch,” WSJ, January 22, 2009.)

 

"A number insignificantly different from zero” — How profound that statement becomes when we consider that in addition to its message of "no multiplier effect” from Obama’s corrupt, embarrassingly ineffective "stimulus” bill, it reminds us that the nation will long bear its burden of debt service and higher taxes.

 

Paul "More Is Better” Krugman, however, blithely pushes inconvenient facts aside as he argues for additional "fiscal stimulus.” But whatever economic damage occurs as a result of the policies he advocates, he’ll still have his job at Princeton and his soapbox at the NY Times.

 

(If Bankruptcy rudely yanks the box from under his feet, he’ll surely be provided with another by MSNBC, PBS, NPR, Time, or Newsweek — unless they have awakened to find Bankruptcy summarily yanking everything from their offices and production centers.)

 

Ironically, then, it’s the Democrats who may end up as the boiled frog after the public has had its chance to react to an economic program based upon the slogan, "Prosperity through astounding borrowing, astonishing spending, stupendous tax increases, shocking utility bill explosions, and massive government intervention!”

 

Now, while that’s a disaster for Barack, Nancy, Harry, and every other liberal, it’s a boon for the rest of the nation.

Social Bookmarking
                 

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review