About AJ DiCintio
A.J. DiCintio is a Featured Writer for The New Media Journal. He first exercised his polemical skills arguing with friends on
the street corners of the working class neighborhood where he grew up.
Retired from teaching, he now applies those skills, somewhat honed and
polished by experience, to social/political affairs.
Soon after brave Iranians began putting
their lives on the line for freedom, justice, and a better life, Nicolas
Sarkozy condemned the violence by Iran’s government and supported
fundamental human rights for Iran’s people.
(The same Nicolas Sarkozy, by the way, who, according to the Israeli
newspaper Haaretz, characterized candidate Obama’s Iran policy as
“utterly immature” and composed of “formulations empty of all content.”)
So did Gordon Brown stand for principle.
And the EU leadership.
And both houses of the U.S. Congress.
However, except for squeaking a few platitudes, Barack Obama remained
largely silent about an uprising that could lead to the overthrow of one
of the world’s most repressive, most dangerous governments, explaining
through his press secretary that his biggest concern is this:
“We’re not going to be used as political foils and political footballs
in a debate that’s happening by [sic] Iranians in Iran.”
A mere “debate” occurring in Iran?
What a stunning perversion of morality and language. Even worse, it is
no slip; for Obama spoke in exactly the same manner when he doubly
insulted every freedom loving person in the world, first by
characterizing the reality in Iran as a “robust debate” and second by
displaying the astonishing chutzpah required to say that for the first
time since the Islamic Revolution of ’79, the Iranian government has an
opportunity to educate the planet about “what Iran is and is not.”
So there we have it. Instead of speaking maturely about
important principles, the leader of the free world, who fancies himself
a refreshing agent of change, exposed himself as nothing more than a
political hack who counts talk as being so cheap he can blithely throw
into the trash can words he intoned in his “new beginning”
Cairo speech a few weeks ago.
America does not presume to know what is best for everyone. . . But I
do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things:
the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed;
confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice;
government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people; the
freedom to live as you choose. Those are not just American ideas, they
are human rights, and that is why we will support them everywhere.
In addition to being shamefully unprincipled, the
president’s behavior was also embarrassingly ironic; for Iran’s fascists
responded to his “caution” by kicking him around as a meddling
imperialist, thereby making (surprise, surprise) an Ugly American foil
of him.
Now, since it is clear that, as others have, Obama could have given
voice to the universal “human rights” he pledged to “support everywhere”
and do so without endangering members of the Iranian opposition or
opening the U.S. to real charges of being an imperialist bully, the
relevant question about his behavior asks “why?”
As usual, Obama’s slobbering sycophants answer that question by
dogmatically bending a knee to White House talking points — and then,
with furious haste, returning to their contemplations regarding the
thrill “God” (see Evan Thomas) sends up their legs or discussions about
which cover photo best captures his almighty nature (see, especially,
Evan Thomas’ Newsweek).
But because the rest of us should take the question seriously, my answer
to it is this:
Obama is simply being Obama. That is, he is following the Obama
Narrative to a tee by placing The Incredible Barack Obama at the Center
of All Things.
Yes, the truth about Barack Obama of Chicago, Illinois, is this: He
regards himself as the only one who can use his miraculous “gift” to
soothe the savage breast of Iran’s terrorist supporting, nuclear arms
coveting fascist gang — if only impudent demonstrators, pompous heads of
state, meddling legislators, mindless commentators, and uninformed
citizens would get out of his way.
(Regarding the “gift,” no less an apostle than Senator Harry Reid claims
Obama revealed its existence to him without — as befitting a divine
being — “the barest hint of braggadocio or conceit.”)
But there is a more important truth evident here, for asking the world
to accept him as The One is what Obama has been doing all along. And
millions, including congressional Democrats, have declared their
complete faith in him.
For example, Obama has never deemed it important to use his rhetorical
skills to explain the full consequences of a spending and borrowing
binge unprecedented in human history; but congressional Democrats borrow
and spend according to his every wish, at times giving testimony to
their deep, unshakeable faith by passing bills without even reading
them.
Trillions upon trillions upon trillions in borrowing and spending,
including . . .
$800 billion for a pork-stuffed “stimulus” whose effects will be felt
“sometime” and whose on-going future costs will be paid “somehow” by
states and municipalities
Nearly $200 billion so that bailed out AIG could pay $12 billion to
politically well-connected Goldman Sachs and foreign banks — 100 cents
on the dollar
Tens of billions (and counting) to avoid real bankruptcy for GM and
Chrysler in favor of a bogus bankruptcy that results in government
ownership, thereby installing Obama as de facto CEO of entities we must
now call “corporations socialized for an indeterminate period of time”
$1.5 trillion (and counting) for health care “reform” with not a mention
of how to come up with a penny to pay for it, except that Obama has
suggested he could appropriately multiply the “bread” brought in by a
tax on soda and potato chips
Finally, on top of the incredible borrowing and spending, there is the
$846 billion (CBO estimate) that Obama’s Cap-and-Trade proposal will
suck out of the economy.
But right on cue, Obama counsels the public to fear not; for he promises
(1) to protect Americans (especially seniors) from devastating increases
in their utility bills (2) to convince China and India to implement
America’s carbon policies (3) to create economic growth despite the
burden of the onerous cost of the C&T program (4) to create millions of
good jobs, especially for young people who deserve a particularly good
return on all the hope they have invested.
You say that these megalomaniacal fiscal and foreign affairs policies
will avoid disaster only if Obama can suspend the laws of economics and
human nature?
(Remember, we haven’t even touched upon national security policies, for
example, Obama’s promise to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay without
first having figured out where to send the prisoners. Does the call to
faith sound familiar?)
Well, ye of little faith, The One will tell you that you have forgotten
about his “gift.”
And after he has completed his labors, he will also tell you he has
earned the right to indulge in a bit of perfectly human behavior.
Thus, on a metaphorical seventh day, he will reprise what he did
recently when he swatted a fly into oblivion and grace himself with this
perfectly arrogant assertion disguised as a humble question: “Pretty
impressive, wasn’t it?”