
Brian Cherry
Will Obama Debate John McCain
Without Preconditions?
July 7, 2008
The world of Presidential
candidate Barack Obama must be a strange and fascinating place. You get
to be the "post-racial" guy while dealing the race card from the bottom
of the deck like an old time poker cheat. Along with this political
slight of hand, your solution to solving the fuel crisis involves
punishing the people who actually produce the gas while raising taxes on
the people who buy gas.
When it comes to gas, Mr. Obama is having
a sort of political dyslexia. On the campaign trail he said that "Gas
prices are killing folks. I got an email from a friend of mine; it says,
just in case you're not living in the real world, being driven around by
Secret Service, it just cost me $85 to fill up my tank." Of course in
true fashion of people who can magically talk out of two orifices at
once, he told CNBC on June 10th, 2008 regarding gas prices that
"I think that I would have preferred a
gradual adjustment." (For those who can't read DNC code, "adjustment"
refers to the raise in gas prices). He then went on to talk about how he
was not on board with lowering the prices or increasing the supply; just
for helping us, and the market, adjust to the higher prices. This topic
was preceded by a rambling diatribe about how American's consume too
much energy, and there was no policy in place to control our personal
consumption.
This is the sort of logic that comes from
someone who reaches for your necktie when he claims he is trying to help
you tighten your belt…for your own good, of course. It should worry
people that Barack turns into a
flatulist whenever policies
that directly affect the household budget of the American people are
talked about, but should we be concerned that he seems to have trouble
discerning between a sworn enemyof the United States and an American war
hero as well?
During a CNN debate in July of 2007,
Obama was asked, if elected, would he would be willing to meet with the
leaders of Iran, Syria, Venezuela, Cuba and North Korea "without
precondition".
"I would," Obama said in a very matter of
fact manner.
John McCain, say what you will
about his conservative credentials, spent five years of his life being
tortured in a Vietnamese prison camp and NOT giving up information to
our enemies. Thanks to his treatment by the North Vietnamese, John
McCain will never be able to do the wave at a sporting event or give a
high five. I think this qualifies him as a loyal patriot to the United
States.
By way of contrast, Iranian
President, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad was probably involved in taking our
embassy staff hostage in the seventies, has declared that Israel should
be wiped off the map, chants "Death to America" as often as humanly
possible, and probably kicks puppies when nobody is looking. So why is
Barack Obama willing to meet with Mahmoud without any preconditions, but
won't debate John McCain unless the Arizona Senator agress to an entire
menu of concessions?
We tried to get an explanation
from the Obama campaign regarding this contradiction, but they seemed
very unwilling to comment, and more then a little crabby that we even
brought it up.
We talked to the McCain folks
as well. While the campaign worker we spoke with would not divulge any
information regarding the ongoing negotiations about the preconditions
that must exist before Barack will sit down to debate the issues with
John McCain, they are at least willing to put us on their calendar. They
found it curious as well that Mr. Obamas is willing to talk to brutal
dictators, thugs, and murderers without any preconditions but demands a
laundry list of concessions from an American patriot before he is
willing to be in the same room, talking about the direction of the
country.
Rick Davis of the McCain
campaign had the following to say about their troubles getting a
commitment from Obama regarding debates:
“We fear that our negotiations over joint
town hall meetings are turning into a debate about process.”
One concession we do know that the Obama
campaign has asked for involved the timing of the first debate. Barack
would agree to a live, town hall debate only over the July 4th weekend;
a time when most people are about as far removed from their televisions
as Obama is from the idea of America producing its own oil. He seems to
be taking the tree falling in a forest approach to the debates. After
his disastrous performance against Hillary in Philadelphia last April;
the one that forced him to declare that he would agree to no more
debates, can you blame him for not wanting to pry himself from his
teleprompter? All his gaffes have come when the words are his own, and
the not the product of a speech writer.
We can only assume other concessions that
he has demanded involve Obama friendly moderators, hand picked audience
members, cherry picked questions, and the complete exclusion of Fox
News.
We will see if the McCain campaign does
actually find time for us and print an update when we are given their
direct quotes.
We don't expect any
cooperation from the Obama campaign, but after Barack stating in such a
matter of fact manner that he would meet with
Mahmoud
Ahmadinejad or Castro with no conditions, what can they really say about
refusing to discuss the direction of the United States with John McCain
until the republican candidate agrees to a litany of preconditions. It
makes you wonder who Barack Obama really sees as an enemy of America.