|
Christina England
What Is Being Covered Up and Why?
February 21, 2009
It seems that the whole world is talking about the possible vaccine link
to Autism. So what is it that pharmaceutical industries and Governments
are trying to hide? As more and more cover ups and conspiracies appear
on the Child Health Safety website, I took a closer look. All around the
world more and more children are being diagnosed with the label Autistic
Spectrum Disorder. Almost everyone we speak to has an Autistic child in
the family or knows someone who has. With 1 child in every 150 children
labeled Autistic this is hardly surprising, so what is it that is
causing this huge rise in Autism and children suffering from various
complex neurological disorders? Is it environmental? Is it genetic? Is
it the vaccines? Or is it something else?
Well, the way I see it if it was purely the vaccines, then all children
would be Autistic so that puts paid to the vaccine theory, or does it?
What if some children have a genetic predisposition to an interaction
with certain chemicals or substances in the vaccines? What amounts to an
adverse reaction to a vaccine? How many children have minor adverse
reactions, such as a sore arm or slight irritability after a vaccine
that go unreported? How does anyone really know what goes on inside our
children’s bodies when we give them vaccine after vaccine? Simple answer
is we don't, we simply have not got a clue. We don't know if a sore arm
after one vaccine and then a bout of sickness after another will lead to
Autism if yet another vaccine is given. What is really behind the MMR
theory? Why do certain professionals swear that vaccines are causing
this huge rise in Autism and why is it when they speak of their concerns
they are professionally destroyed?
I think to really study this we have to see when this huge rise in
Autism began to occur. Well looking at various graphs around the
Internet the rise in Autism began to occur in the early 1990's.
We know that Thimerosal was first added to vaccines in 1930's.
Thimerosal is a mercury-based compound used as a carrier and
preservative in many vaccines past and present. Thimerosal is extremely
toxic and carries the toxic symbol. It is typically 49.6% mercury. It
was first put into vaccines by the company Eli Lilly in the early 1930's
as a bactericide; this was to make it possible for multi dose vials to
be used instead of single dose vials which were more expensive.
The DPT was introduced in 1957 and gradually more and more vaccines
entered the vaccine schedule most containing Thimerosal.
Gradually over time more and more children began to show early signs of
Autism. A particular rise was seen just after the MMR in 1987 was
introduced and this concerned professionals who were seeing more and
more children showing signs of complex disorders. Professionals began to
worry and express their concerns one such professional was Lisa
Blakemore-Brown. Lisa an educational psychologist began to notice a rise
in children showing signs of Autism and associated disorders, such as
hyperactivity, tics and poor concentration. She saw children presenting
with various patterns of neurological disorders, which she felt were
interweaving together, giving children very complex patterns of
disabilities which she aptly named Tapestry Disorders, due to their
interweaving nature. The more she tried to express her concerns the more
her views were dismissed. She first expressed her concerns in 1997.She
believed that Thimerosal in the vaccines was the cause. She also saw
links with Thimerosal being used in vaccines and the rise in cot death.
She wrote several letters to the UK Government expressing her fears and
also the fear that many parents were being falsely accused of Munchausen
by Proxy when they tried to get answers for their children's
disabilities, all of which were ignored, the ones that were answered
were answered curtly and abruptly simply brushing her fears aside in a
rather patronizing way. One such letter is a letter written to Lisa in
2002 from
Jackie Smith MP
The MMR was added to the vaccine schedule in 1987 and the rise in Autism
rocketed even further this was proved in
a Japanese Study. With this study you will see data from formal
medical peer referred papers showing that the number of Japanese
children developing autism in Japan was directly related to the number
who received MMR and single measles vaccines. This is proof the vaccines
caused autism in Japanese children and so will do the same to children
around the world.
In 2005 a paper by two Japanese researchers, Hideo Honda and Yasuo
Shimizu, was published in an English psychiatric journal with
psychiatrist Professor Sir Michael Rutter also named as an author. The
paper was claimed to be proof MMR vaccine could not cause autistic
spectrum disorders. But the authors failed to provide the full picture,
as they do, remember Dr Jayne Donegan speaking of
tweaking results of studies they made invalid claims. Those claims
were based on inadequate research containing basic flaws.
When the flaws are identified and corrected, the paper provides
unusually strong evidence, not normally seen, implicating vaccines, as a
cause of Autistic Spectrum Disorders (ASD).The paper shows, when
corrected with the missing data, Autistic Spectrum Disorder numbers
increased and decreased in direct proportion to the total number of
measles and MMR vaccines given to children.
So why did the Japanese professionals and Michael Rutter tweak results.
Could it be perhaps that he like all the professionals in my article
Pharma have no scruples when it comes to meddling professionals has
strong links to Glaxo Smith Kline the manufacturer of the MMR? In fact
like Dr Ellison that the GMC used as their prosecution witness in the Dr
Donegan case, he has been a paid expert witness on their behalf in the
UK MMR vaccine damage litigation, also Professor Rutter is one of the
main prosecution witnesses in the
British GMC case against Dr Andrew Wakefield, Dr Simon Murch and
Professor Walker-Smith. Of course this is a pure coincidence,
although I beginning not to believe in coincidences anymore as my common
sense is somewhat clouding my judgment.
In a study by
Carol Stott, Ph.D.; Mark Blaxill; Andrew J.Wakefield,M.B., FRCS it
again shows a strong coalition with the introduction of the MMR in 1987
and the increase in Autism. So why are these studies being ignored? In
2000 a secret meeting was held without public scrutiny between the
vaccine manufacturers, representatives, 51 US scientists, and a
representative of the World Health Organization. This was to discuss
a study by US Centers for Disease Control expert Dr Thomas Verstraeten
of increasing doses of Thimerosal and neuro-developmental disorders in
children. Verstraeten used US Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) data, an
official US governmental data bank on the children from US health
maintenance organizations (HMOs).
Verstraeten´s study showed a dose-response relationship between
Thimerosal in vaccines and neuro-developmental disorders in children
that held up to rigorous statistical analyses. This means Verstraeten´s
study showed a causal association between the amount of Thimerosal in
vaccines a child received and the extent to which the child developed
the symptoms of impaired brain development. These ranged from tics,
speech impairment to symptoms of and full autism. The discussions can be
read in the
transcript of the Simpsonwood Conference obtained by US organization
SafeMinds under Freedom of Information. Three years on Verstreten joined
the staff of Glaxo Smith Kline and a different paper emerges, this one
is called
Safety of Thimerosal-Containing Vaccines: A Two-Phased Study of
Computerized Health Maintenance Organization Databases this one has
a different set of data from the HMO. A complete picture of this story
along with even more damning information on the MMR vaccine and Autism
can be found on
Child Health Safety website.
So why were secret meetings held and why were the results of the
findings not made public? During the Simpsonwood meeting no photocopying
was allowed and no person attending was allowed to remove any paperwork.
Why was this? It is only because of the Freedom of Information Act that
the general public is becoming fully aware of secrets locked away and
hidden from their knowledge. Even now with all this data becoming
available Governments and drug companies are still insisting that these
vaccines are safe. Yet data freely available on the Internet seems to
tell a very different story.
Another interesting pattern emerging is how Glaxo Smith Kline is paying
in various ways dodgy professionals to make complaints, to be their
expert witnesses, to destroy difficult but truthful professionals and to
generally cover up what is going on. Why would that be? If Glaxo has
nothing to hide, then why the cover up? I am particularly interested in
the Brian Deer link because Brian Deer a journalist was commissioned by
the Sunday Times to write a series of extremely damning article about Dr
Wakefield. Dr Wakefield is another doctor being investigated by the
British GMC for speaking out about the MMR and its links to Autism. It
now materializes that the complainant was in fact Deer himself. It's
very suspicious as Brian Deer was hired by a then Sunday Times editor
Pauk Nuki, whose father, Professor George Nuki had sat on the UK
Government Committee with others some of whom were implicated in attacks
on Wakefield and were also involved in approving the now proven
dangerous and withdrawn Pluserix MMR vaccine.
The Judge who made the decision which effectively ended the UK
litigation, Judge Nigel Davis, is the brother of Glaxo board director
Crispin Davis. Pluserix MMR was made and supplied by a GlaxoSmithKline
company. It was given to many of the children in the UK litigation.
Crispin Davis had been brought onto the Glaxo Board only 2 months before
The Sunday Times hired Brian Deer to write the articles attacking
Wakefield. Crispin Davis was also the CEO of the owners of The Lancet.
Judge Davis later claimed that it had not occurred to him there might be
a conflict of interest. (All this information can be found on links
provided)
Interested? Well also sitting with Professor George Nuki in that UK
Government Committee was Professor Sir Roy Meadow. Now Sir Roy Meadow
had sat in other notorious meetings on the adverse reactions to vaccines
back in the 1980's. Sir Roy Meadow was involved in meetings with
reference to the Safety of Vaccines as part of the
Joint Sub Committee on Adverse Reactions to Vaccination and Immunization
in the 1980's.This indicates that he is fully aware of the harmful
effects that vaccines can have on children. However, to this day he
still gives evidence as an Expert Witness in MSBP cases ,where babies
have died very shortly after vaccine, while stating that vaccines 'could
not' have attributed to their death. Surely these documents show that
Sir Roy Meadow has a clear conflict of interest. Even more interesting
is that he was the Expert Witness at the
Sally Clark case
You have to wonder if he too was receiving money from Glaxo Smith Kline
don't you? All this amounts to one big cover up. Drug companies are
covering up the damage that is being systematically done to our
children. I would call this 'Making the facts fit the theory'. The
problem is every day more and more is being uncovered and they are all
running round like headless chickens. Can they continue to hide the
truth much longer? I doubt it. It has even materialized that the Bush
administration had massive
family ties to drugs firm Eli Lilly
The problem is when the general public watch videos such as the
Hidden Truth they really begin to see what the Governments and
Pharmaceutical Industries having been trying to hide for years. It looks
like the professionals like Lisa Blakemore-Brown, Dr Jayne Donegan, Dr
Andrew Wakefield, Dr Simon Murch, Professor Walker-Smith, Dr Peter
Mansfield, Prof Gordon Stewart, Dr Mark Geire and Journalist Melanie
Phillips and many more were right along.
Apologies in writing to them all would be appreciated. |
