|
NewMediaJournal.us
www.NewMediaJournal.us
Return
to Article
Kindle Compatible
Rebecca S. Busch
Reform & Employer Healthcare Benefit Plans
December 8, 2009
Regardless of what shape healthcare reform takes,
the "system” will still be a victim to immensely
costly fraud by providers, sponsors (employers),
patients, organized crime and the evolving ethically
challenged schemes that fall into white collar crime
activity. The main victims of healthcare fraud are
sponsors with ongoing increases in premiums that are
passed down to their employees, insurers who have to
pass this cost back to their sponsors, the
government (Medicare/Medicaid) who has to pass this
cost back to the tax payer, and any party who has to
manage and work in this economy in hidden forms of
tax payments.
Here is a snap shot of why a gun shot reform policy cannot be executed.
Just way too much history- a few highlights:
▪ The Insurance Monitor, "the opportunities for fraud [in health
insurance] upset all statistical calculations ... Health and sicknesses
are vague terms open to endless construction. Death is clearly defined,
but to say what shall constitute such loss of health as will justify
insurance compensation is no easy task" (July 1919, vol 67 (7), p 38).
▪ Prior to 1920 the programs provided where Illness Benefits.
▪ 1920 - 1930 Compulsory insurance reform failed in US
▪ 1930 Birth of BCBS for illness benefit coverage out of a teachers
union in Texas (simplified)
▪ 1940s growth of private insurance market - after the proliferation of
money into the market
▪ "Insurance" when from community rate based mix pricing to risk based -
which requires the elimination of high risk people
▪ World war wage freezes - resulting in additional compensation through
enhance benefits. Starting the movement from illness coverage to Health
coverage
▪ Medicare and Medicare came into play by 1960 too many unemployed poor
elderly - no care have grown from illness coverage to health coverage.
Two very different concepts.
▪ Fraud, fraud, fraud, abuse, and waste intermingled with
legitimate services
▪ We have shifted risk from the provider to the payer to the employer
now back to the employee. We have no one left to shift the costs to.
▪ The tax payer is saying wait a minute. As a tax payer i am an
employer, i am an employee, i can only be taxed so many times...
Healthcare reform has been around since the early 1900's with at least 8
major initiatives that have never fully progressed. Just a series of
bandages and we are hemorrhaging now. Recently, I have learned that
payers, for those of us who are deep into the healthcare market place,
have a new policy when an employer is late on paying their premiums.
Payers are having their own issues with diminishing dollars; as a result
some are implementing a new practice. If an
employer is late in paying their health insurance premium bills to their
insurance company - apparently the healthcare claims for the month in
which the payment is paid late or not paid at all - is being denied.
This is placing the patients who have employer coverage into a
tail spin and the providers who are trying to stay afloat in a difficult
position collecting from their patients. The employer is now dealing
with employee complaints in particular if their premiums are being
taking out in a timely basis. This is just the beginning of what happens
when every market player is feeling the squeeze. It is a domino effect
of consequences.
The amount of "risk” and the proliferation of fraud schemes to offset a
sinking economy are only going to get worse.
To truly make a dent in the plague of healthcare fraud and runway
escalating costs this is what congress needs to do:
▪
All healthcare market players including government programs must use
accrual accounting methods.
▪
Any healthcare transactions, the terms, the amount paid must be
transparent, and the parties receiving monies be disclosed.
▪
Private payers cannot pay less then Medicare or Medicaid.
▪
Private payers cannot adopt Medicare program provisions without making
all of their provision public.
▪
Health insurance should be sold and managed in the same context as
property and casualty – which means geographic limitations, should not
exist.
▪
Health plans should be defined in the following categories: "wellness
coverage;” "illness coverage;” "Catastrophic coverage;” or a combination
thereof.
In all of
the above scenarios we cannot control what we cannot see. The
initiatives should focus on getting transparency provisions from the
patient, provider, payer, plan sponsor, and vendor perspective. Congress
is struggling with their initiative because they address one issue
without realizing the domino affect of the policy on the other market
players. They are attempting to create reform without 20/20 vision. Get
the vision and transparency first then make the changes.
About Rebecca S. Busch
Rebecca S. Busch, RN, MBA, CCM, CFE,
CHS-III, CBM, CPC, FIALCP, FHFMA is CEO of
Medical Business Associates,
Inc., and author of "Electronic
Health Records An Audit and Internal Control Guide”
and "Healthcare
Fraud Audit & Detection Guide.” |