Front Page           
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
American Fifth Column
Culture Wars             
Headlines                 
Analysis               
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Analysis Archive
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google


See blogs and businesses for USA
About Rebecca S. Busch
Rebecca S. Busch, RN, MBA, CCM, CFE, CHS-III, CBM, CPC, FIALCP, FHFMA is CEO of Medical Business Associates, Inc., and author of "Electronic Health Records An Audit and Internal Control Guide” and "Healthcare Fraud Audit & Detection Guide.”

Social Bookmarking

Past Articles
Reform & Employer Healthcare Benefit Plans
Healthcare Reform...Not Behind Closed Doors!
Healthcare Reform: The Application of Business 101?
"Reforming" Healthcare Reform
 

Rebecca S. Busch
Reform & Employer Healthcare Benefit Plans
December 8, 2009

Regardless of what shape healthcare reform takes, the “system” will still be a victim to immensely costly fraud by providers, sponsors (employers), patients, organized crime and the evolving ethically challenged schemes that fall into white collar crime activity. The main victims of healthcare fraud are sponsors with ongoing increases in premiums that are passed down to their employees, insurers who have to pass this cost back to their sponsors, the government (Medicare/Medicaid) who has to pass this cost back to the tax payer, and any party who has to manage and work in this economy in hidden forms of tax payments.

 

Here is a snap shot of why a gun shot reform policy cannot be executed. Just way too much history- a few highlights:

 

▪ The Insurance Monitor, "the opportunities for fraud [in health insurance] upset all statistical calculations ... Health and sicknesses are vague terms open to endless construction. Death is clearly defined, but to say what shall constitute such loss of health as will justify insurance compensation is no easy task" (July 1919, vol 67 (7), p 38).

 

▪ Prior to 1920 the programs provided where Illness Benefits.

 

▪ 1920 - 1930 Compulsory insurance reform failed in US

 

▪ 1930 Birth of BCBS for illness benefit coverage out of a teachers union in Texas (simplified)

 

▪ 1940s growth of private insurance market - after the proliferation of money into the market

 

▪ "Insurance" when from community rate based mix pricing to risk based - which requires the elimination of high risk people

 

▪ World war wage freezes - resulting in additional compensation through enhance benefits. Starting the movement from illness coverage to Health coverage

 

▪ Medicare and Medicare came into play by 1960 too many unemployed poor elderly - no care have grown from illness coverage to health coverage. Two very different concepts.

 

Fraud, fraud, fraud, abuse, and waste intermingled with legitimate services

 

▪ We have shifted risk from the provider to the payer to the employer now back to the employee. We have no one left to shift the costs to.

 

The tax payer is saying wait a minute. As a tax payer i am an employer, i am an employee, i can only be taxed so many times...

 

Healthcare reform has been around since the early 1900's with at least 8 major initiatives that have never fully progressed. Just a series of bandages and we are hemorrhaging now. Recently, I have learned that payers, for those of us who are deep into the healthcare market place, have a new policy when an employer is late on paying their premiums. Payers are having their own issues with diminishing dollars; as a result some are implementing a new practice. If an employer is late in paying their health insurance premium bills to their insurance company - apparently the healthcare claims for the month in which the payment is paid late or not paid at all - is being denied. This is placing the patients who have employer coverage into a tail spin and the providers who are trying to stay afloat in a difficult position collecting from their patients. The employer is now dealing with employee complaints in particular if their premiums are being taking out in a timely basis. This is just the beginning of what happens when every market player is feeling the squeeze. It is a domino effect of consequences.

 

The amount of “risk” and the proliferation of fraud schemes to offset a sinking economy are only going to get worse. To truly make a dent in the plague of healthcare fraud and runway escalating costs this is what congress needs to do:

 

All healthcare market players including government programs must use accrual accounting methods.

 

Any healthcare transactions, the terms, the amount paid must be transparent, and the parties receiving monies be disclosed.

 

Private payers cannot pay less then Medicare or Medicaid.

 

Private payers cannot adopt Medicare program provisions without making all of their provision public.

 

Health insurance should be sold and managed in the same context as property and casualty – which means geographic limitations, should not exist.

 

Health plans should be defined in the following categories: “wellness coverage;” “illness coverage;” “Catastrophic coverage;” or a combination thereof.

 

In all of the above scenarios we cannot control what we cannot see. The initiatives should focus on getting transparency provisions from the patient, provider, payer, plan sponsor, and vendor perspective. Congress is struggling with their initiative because they address one issue without realizing the domino affect of the policy on the other market players. They are attempting to create reform without 20/20 vision. Get the vision and transparency first then make the changes.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org