Front Page           
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
American Fifth Column
Culture Wars             
Headlines                 
Analysis               
NMJ Radio          
NMJ TV               
Analysis Archive
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google


See blogs and businesses for USA
About Rebecca S. Busch
Rebecca S. Busch, RN, MBA, CCM, CFE, CHS-III, CBM, CPC, FIALCP, FHFMA is CEO of Medical Business Associates, Inc., and author of "Electronic Health Records An Audit and Internal Control Guide” and "Healthcare Fraud Audit & Detection Guide.”

Past Articles
Healthcare Reform...Not Behind Closed Doors!
Healthcare Reform: The Application of Business 101?
"Reforming" Healthcare Reform
 
Social Bookmarking

Rebecca S. Busch
Healthcare Reform...Please, Not Behind Closed Doors!
December 8, 2009

US Senator Mary Landrieu of Louisiana stated in response to initiatives to move the healthcare reform package onto the debate floor “My vote should in no way be construed by the supporters of this current framework as an indication of how I might vote on the final Bill.” A statement she clarified after securing the receipt of a $300 million dollar bribe for her home state of Louisiana while contributing toward the baby steps in the passage of healthcare reform.

 

Ms. Landrieu, as a twenty year veteran healthcare patient advocate, let me introduce you to one of my patient fall out victims of today’s health care system. Her name is Mary. She is from Illinois and is 45 year old veteran registered intensive care nurse with fifteen years of working in addition to her nursing “job” as a medical auditor of hospital bills and medical records. This is her recent experience:

 

“I need help” she states “I am in massive amounts of pain and cannot walk” she further elaborates that she had injured her knee that day. She rated her pain as an 11 on a scale of 1 to 10. She goes into see her doctor. She is told that she may have torn a ligament in her right knee. They are not sure. She asked “Should I get an MRI to understand the source of the pain?” “No” responded the doctor. Upon physical examination, she was told “You have to go to physical therapy for six weeks.” She asked “What is exactly wrong with my knee – I have never been in this much pain!” He followed up with “I am not sure; however, the insurance company will not pay for an MRI unless you go to physical therapy for six weeks first.”

 

Unable to barely walk – she attended her first physical therapy session. The therapy session was initiated. Mary experienced excruciating pain. The therapist told her “I have no idea why you are in such severe pain!” The therapist did not stop the therapy session – the therapist continued without understanding why Mary was experiencing increased pain during the treatment. As Mary left the session she collapsed from the pain on her way out the door and sprained her ankle. Now she has two injuries to deal with. By nightfall she called me. “I am in so much pain I don’t know what to do!” I told her “You have no choice. Go to the ER – now.”

 

In the emergency room they did a physical exam and a “doppler study” (avoiding the MRI scan that would cost about $2,220) to determined the following: It appears that Mary injured a ligament. She developed a cyst (a pocket of blood below the knee from the original injury) and the therapist ruptured the cyst during the physical therapy session. The blood had no where to go except her knee cap. The blood sitting within the knee cap was the cause of the unbearable pain and subsequent visit to the emergency room for a price tag in excess of $7,000 dollars. The attempt of saving $2,220 resulted in an additional expenditure of $12,000. Please note this does not include the costs associated with the sprained ankle.

 

Ms. Landrieu this is an experienced registered nurse and medical auditor who fell through the cracks of our healthcare system! Imagine what the typical consumer has to endure. The conversation between a doctor and a patient (who happens to be a nurse) should never be “This is the care I recommend based on what will be paid!” I hear this type of story on a daily basis. What other types of horse trading activities are occurring in the market place?

 

The American Medical Association (AMA) was facing a 21 percent cut in physicians’ reimbursements – President Obama promised to suspend this cut back if he received support for his healthcare reform package. The AMA, keepers of the Hippocratic Oath of do no harm. In the horse trade transaction by the AMA to reduce and avoid the reductions in the rates of physician compensation are they compromising the relationship between the patient and the doctor? Will the AMA advocate for integrity of a the doctor patient relationship in any healthcare reform package?

 

Please let me introduce you to another one of my patient fall out victims. His name is Doug who lives in New York and has been battling multiple myeloma. He has and continues to have ongoing issues ranging from his employer benefits as an employee and the receipt of benefit services. His employer did not inform of his rights to obtain disability while he was employed. They offered instead to let him take a few paid weeks off to address his illness. Eventually his division was shut down and he was out of a job. Even though he requested an application for disability from Human Resources – they never provided him the form while he was an employee. Once he was discharged from his employment he lost his right to his disability policy. The following is another example of one of his healthcare encounters.

 

Doug called me “XXX insurance company is denying my Doctor’s recommendation for a stem cell transplant?” The reason “They are telling me that it is experimental and will not pay for it at this time.” I know from my years of audit experience that this insurance company has paid for this procedure in the past. My advice to Doug “Write a letter and state the following: Please tell me what ICD-9CM code and respective CPT codes were utilized to render an opinion that my doctors’ recommendation was experimental?” I had Doug fax and mail the letter to the claims supervisor. I received a call from Doug – four days later. “I just received a letter stating that they will cover my procedure!” Anyone reading this article – if you do not understand the world of ICD and CPT codes you cannot fully advocate for yourself!

 

I am not expecting the average reader to understand what happened in the case of Doug. However, the typical consumer today cannot understand the dynamics of getting and paying for healthcare. I do not know of any legitimate doctor that is not frustrated when their plan of care is driven by rules that do not allow for individual consideration. A reform bill that further buries the rules of the game and how choices are made will result in chaos. Our “human capital” is the essence and backbone of this country. We cannot allow the demise of our health as individuals or as a group fall into these gaps. This discussion of improving “health” in the United States should not be driven by “horse trading.” Horse trading is the opportunity to buy a vote in the passage of healthcare reform to satisfy the “what’s in it for me” syndrome. When this takes place we compromise our ability to maintain integrity in the process of creating a reform package that has substance to address the real issues. Another example of horse trading is reflected within the pharmaceutical industry.

 

Dear pharmaceutical industry, please do not forget that you are an employer with employee benefits! The reform package WILL affect your bottom line. The price tag for your horse trade of a 10 year limit of $80 billion on cuts in prescription cuts along with preventing the sale of lower cost legitimate Canadian prescriptions from entering the US – victimization of the average consumer. Eventually it will catch up to the pharmaceutical industry in lost sales. Why? The Canadian ban does not help the individual who is facing limitations in household budgets for badly needed medications. The result is an increasing victimization of these individuals who will fall pray to buying cheap counterfeit prescription medications. Take for instance operation code-named Pangea that was a world wide effort to crack down on prescription “cheap” medications. Medications made with cost efficient ingredients such as drywall material, antifreeze and yellow highway paint. Consumers who do not have enough money will not be buying YOUR drugs. They will be looking for a cheaper option. Thus the increase potential for victimization of consumers who need their prescriptions but cannot afford to pay US retail prices. Imagine the price tag we face in our emergency rooms across the country as these patients are admitted with adverse complications from drugs made with antifreeze and the provider struggling to figure exactly what is wrong with the patient? The chaos has only just begun.

 

Finally ladies and gentleman of congress, please keep the following in mind as you write your reform bill. Your efforts are creating the infrastructure for healthcare in which your constituency will receive a direct impact. It is a package in which you as members of congress are exempt. However, you will be indirectly impacted by your policy. The parties such as providers, payers, pharmaceuticals, equipment companies and so forth that provide care to all citizens including those members of congress – you will be subjected to the chaos you create. That is unless you intend to build government owned hospitals, government own pharmaceuticals, and government owned professional staff – that will only be dedicated to treat and care for the exempts parties of the reform package. Please – do not reduce the essence of our health, our well being, to a series of horse trade transactions.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

The New Media Journal.us © 2010
A Division of BasicsProject.org