New Front Page         
NMJ Search              
International              
Islamist Terrorism      
Government & Politics
National & Local        
The Fifth Column       
Culture Wars             
Editorials                  
Analysis                   
Archive                     
NMJ Radio                 
NMJ TV                    
Constitutional Literacy
American Fifth Column
Islamist Terrorism
Books 
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...         
Facebook            
Twitter           
Site Information
About Us              
Contact Us           
US Senate
US House
Anti-Google
About Hollis Armstrong
Hollis Armstrong is a veteran intelligence analyst with over twenty years in the field, including over fifteen years in the Middle East. Mr. Armstrong writes for The Gerard Group.
Social Bookmarking
Bookmark and Share
Past Articles
Bad Foreign Policy is Precursor to Disaster

Hollis Armstrong
Bad Foreign Policy is Precursor to Disaster
September 2, 2010

Since the idea of a 'Middle East peace process' was first raised in the international community, its ostensible purpose was based on the concept of achieving peace between Israel and her neighbors in exchange for a two state solution - one for Israel and one for the 'Palestinians'.

This concept was officially established in 1977 when then-President Jimmy Carter took up the banner for Yassir Arafat and publicly called for the creation of a "Palestinian homeland". Two intifadas, two wars, and countless lives lost in terrorist attacks on civilian populations later, the quest for successful 'peace talks' is still going on. This has been a political priority for every successive American president since Carter. Each president has given Middle East peace a high position on his list of presidential goals. Each president appears to have wanted to go down in history as the one who achieved peace in the region.

While the aim may be laudable in principle, it is flawed from beginning to end. In what is perceived as a possible peace framework, every president since Jimmy Carter has overlooked or ignored the realities of the region, and the true character of the people most critically affected by the outcome. By accepting the 'Palestinian' leadership as a viable and honest partner in the process, American administrations have not only entered a no win situation, but endangered the lives of millions of civilians in the region.

Ironically, our government's total lack of understanding of the dynamics of Middle Eastern culture and their impact on the potential for successful peace talks has led not to peace, but to war. Each time a new administration opens a new round of peace talks, the stakes get higher and the cost of peace - in human terms - gets higher and increasingly bloody.

Last night, on the eve of the newest 'peace talks' in Washington, the blood has already begun to flow. Two Israeli couples, including a pregnant woman, traveling in a private car near the town of Kiryat Arba, were shot to death, and their bullet-ridden bodies were thrown onto the street by Palestinian terrorists. Abu Obeida, spokesman for Hamas' military wing, told The Associated Press late Tuesday that Hamas carried out the attack.

Since Israel has been largely free of terrorist attacks in recent years, due in large measure to the controversial security fence and heightened security, the brutality of the attack came as a shock. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called on Israelis for restraint, while Defense Minister Ehud Barak warned, "Israel will not allow terrorists to lift their heads, and will exact a price from the murderers and those who sent them." The 'peace talks' have not yet begun, but the drums of war, born of deep hatred of the Jews by 'Palestinian' terrorists, have already been heard.

One simple fact, clearly stated by the Palestinian leadership since long before this process began, and totally ignored by every president who has entered the peace game, is that these leaders do not want peace - they want the land called Israel - all of it. They have made that abundantly clear. Yet Washington refuses to listen and charges ahead with policies that are doomed to failure, and put both Israel and the civilians in the surrounding countries in great danger.

The primary 'Palestinian partner' for Israel in the quest for peace is the Palestinian Authority (PA). This is the same organization which continues its verbal attacks against Israel in its schools, on the Internet, in the press and media, in its mosques, and in the statements made frequently by public officials that Israel is an illegitimate state, usurping 'Palestinian' land. Official maps identify all of Israel as "Palestine" and Israel is nowhere to be seen. Palestinians are continually encouraged to attack and kill Israelis. They teach their children, through government sanctioned (and produced!) cartoons and television puppet shows (dark equivalents of Sesame Street), and interview shows, that Israel and the Jews are their enemy. On these shows, they encourage their children to become suicide bombers for Allah (shahadah), teaching them that the way to paradise is to kill Jews whenever and wherever they have the opportunity.

Mahmoud Abbas, the President of the Palestinian Authority and other members of Fatah, a powerful political party which endorsed Abbas' Presidency (one of its founders), has openly questioned Israel's right to exist, has called for its destruction. According to one Fatah official, "peace is a means, the goal is Palestine."

While making occasional conciliatory remarks to the press about his desire for peace for his people, Abbas openly supports a broad spectrum of activities that reveal his true inclinations. He recently demanded, as a condition to any direct peace talks with Israel, a total Jewish construction freeze in the West Bank and eastern Jerusalem, and written guarantees on the final borders for a Palestinian state.

How can we be so incredibly stupid as to believe that this is an act of good faith? Negotiations are all about defining the conditions. Preconditions may include the shape of the table, or the people who are to participate, but to make such far reaching demands relating to the outcome of the talks as precondition for negotiations is patently absurd.

Israel will find no honest partner for peace in Mahmoud Abbas. There is no moral equivalent between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. Israel will continue to seek peace, but will fight fiercely to save itself from extinction. Mahmoud Abbas, on the other hand, like his predecessor Yassir Arafat, is not a 'partner for peace' but rather an obstacle to peace who will continue in his quest to obliterate Israel, even as he speaks words of moderation.

When the peace talks begin today, the rhetoric will resonate with empty words glorifying a 'peaceful solution'. But Obama's bid for greatness as the peacemaker will surely meet the same fate as his predecessors - utter failure. As long as the US government ignores the true character of the Palestinian leadership, and the fact that it reflects a culture that uses taqiyah (lying to further Islamic causes) as national policy, the 'peace' talks are doomed to failure. The greatest tragedy of this is that the war that will follow them will introduce to the battlefield the most vile and destructive weapons known to man. The hell of war will follow the misguided policies of arrogant leaders. Many thousands will die, even more will suffer terribly. That it could have all been prevented will be remembered as one of the great tragedies of history.

Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization. Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal. The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations. The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative. Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project’s goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

hit counter

The New Media Journal.us © 2011
A Division of BasicsProject.org
 

Dreamhost Review