Front Page
NMJ Search
International
Islamist Terrorism
Government & Politics
National & Local
The Fifth Column
Culture Wars
Editorials
Analysis
Archive
NMJ Radio
Constitutional Literacy
Islamofascism
Progressivism
Books
NMJ Shop
Links, Etc...
Facebook
Twitter
Site Information
About Us
Contact Us
  US Senate
  US House
  Anti-Google




Last year's debt agreement permits a total debt limit increase of $2.1 trillion in exchange for an equivalent amount in spending cuts over the coming decade.
Social Bookmarking
Print this page.
Vote Gives Obama Option to Raise
Debt Ceiling Another $1.2 Trillion

AP/FOX News
Senate Republicans were unable to muster enough votes Thursday for a bill opposing another $1.2 trillion increase in the debt ceiling. The measure was defeated on a 52-44 vote. Lawmakers would have needed 60 votes in order to push the bill through, and more than that to override a presidential veto. The House had approved the measure last week, but it was expected to fail in the Senate.

The vote caps an unusual process set up at the end of the debt-ceiling debate last summer. The process allows lawmakers, mostly Republicans, to vote against debt increases but not actually block them. Blocking them would provoke a first-ever, market-rattling default on US obligations.

The vote split mostly along party lines. One Republican, Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown, opposed the measure. Two Democrats -- West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin and Nebraska Sen. Ben Nelson -- supported it.

"Look, we should be working together to lower the debt, not having votes to increase it," Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) said Thursday. "No more blank checks."

Republican Pennsylvania Sen. Pat Toomey said the government must live within their means. "Our government is heading toward a fiscal crisis, and now is not the time for the government to take out yet another credit card," he said in a statement.

The national debt has skyrocketed during Obama's first term -- from $10.6 trillion to $15.2 trillion today. Last year's debt agreement permits a total debt limit increase of $2.1 trillion in exchange for an equivalent amount in spending cuts, which would be spread out over the coming decade. The first $900 billion comes from caps on the day-to-day operations of federal agencies.

Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT), said default was unthinkable and that additional borrowing is needed to pay for obligations already incurred by lawmakers.

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), who has voted for many debt increases during GOP administrations, said it is time "get rid of the $1-trillion-plus deficits of the Obama presidency, to get rid of our mountain of debt that surpasses the size of our entire economy, and to bring the size of our federal government back down to historical norms."

The House passed a similar resolution in September after Obama used his authority to raise the debt cap by $500 billion, but it, too, died in the Senate.

READ FULL ARTICLE

Editor's Note: Yet, Senate Republicans abandoned House Republicans during this debate last year and actually had a significant hand in crafting the legislation that, while allowing for political cover in being able to advance a meaningless "no" vote, actually rubber-stamps debt ceiling increases by Pres. Obama. So, don't blame the House Republicans...but you can certainly castigate Senate Republicans and especially Republican leadership in the Senate.







Opinions expressed by contributing writers are expressly their own and may or may not represent the opinions of The New Media Journal, BasicsProject.org, its editorial staff, board or organization.  Reprint inquiries should be directed to the author of the article. Contact the editor for a link request to The New Media Journal.  The New Media Journal is not affiliated with any mainstream media organizations.  The New Media Journal is not supported by any political organization. The New Media Journal is a division of BasicsProject.org, a non-profit, non-partisan 501(c)(3) research and educational initiative.  Responsibility for the accuracy of cited content is expressly that of the contributing author. All original content offered by The New Media Journal and BasicsProject.org is copyrighted. Basics Project's goal is the liberation of the American voter from partisan politics and special interests in government through the primary-source, fact-based education of the American people.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance a more in-depth understanding of critical issues facing the world. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 USC Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to:http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.


The Media Journal.us © 1998-2012    Content Copyright © Individual authors
A Division of BasicsProject.org
Powered by ExpressionEngine 1.70 and M3Server